Arthur Hayes thinks the crypto world is clinging to a dead theory. The BitMEX co-founder published a new analysis this week arguing that Bitcoin’s famous four-year cycle has officially ended, killed off by a completely different set of economic forces.
For years, crypto investors have treated Bitcoin’s roughly four-year pattern like gospel. Buy during the bear market, ride the halving rally, sell before the inevitable 70-80% crash, repeat. Hayes says that playbook is now worthless.
Writing in his latest Substack post titled “Long Live the King,” Hayes makes the case that Bitcoin cycles were never really about halvings or four-year timers. They were about money supply. When central banks printed money, Bitcoin went up. When they tightened credit, it crashed.
He’s pointing to some massive numbers: the US Treasury pumped $2.5 trillion into markets, and the Federal Reserve is cutting rates again. In fact, there’s a 94% chance of more rate cuts coming in October, according to his analysis.
“Listen to our monetary masters in Washington and Beijing,” Hayes wrote. “Money will be cheaper and more plentiful. Therefore, Bitcoin continues to rise.”
This isn’t some technical analysis or chart reading. Hayes is looking at actual policy decisions from the world’s two largest economies. The Fed cut rates in September 2025 after political pressure, and China appears ready to restart monetary stimulus after years of credit tightening.
In previous Bitcoin cycles, China would tighten credit, markets would freak out, and Bitcoin would tank. It happened over and over. But now? China looks like it’s about to open the money taps too, moving away from those deflationary policies.
Hayes calls this the “dual liquidity engines”—both the US and China potentially pumping money into the system at the same time. That’s never really happened before during a Bitcoin bull run.
The institutional money factor matters too. Unlike retail investors who panic-sold during previous bear markets, institutional players use risk management strategies that could reduce traditional volatility patterns. When pension funds and treasury departments own Bitcoin, they don’t dump it because a chart says it’s time.
Hayes acknowledges his prediction record is mixed, but his thesis isn’t based on speculation. It’s built on observable monetary policy changes that affect all risk assets, not just Bitcoin.
If he’s right, crypto investors waiting for the “inevitable” cycle top and 70% crash could be waiting a long time. Traditional cycle analysis suggests Bitcoin should peak soon and then crater. Hayes thinks it could keep climbing well beyond 2025.
The four-year cycle believers argue that mining economics and supply dynamics still matter. Hayes counters that liquidity matters more. When central banks are printing money faster than Bitcoin miners can produce new coins, supply becomes irrelevant.
This isn’t academic theory. Hayes is betting real money on his analysis, and other major crypto players are paying attention. The question isn’t whether Hayes will be proven right or wrong, but whether crypto markets are mature enough to break their own historical patterns.
Bitcoin has followed its four-year cycle for over a decade. If Hayes is correct, that era just ended. The new cycle isn’t based on time or halvings, it’s based on how much money the world’s central banks decide to print.
You need to login in order to Like
Leave a comment